Med. Pro Praxi 2009; 6(1): 22-24

Thrombosis and sarcomas

MUDr. Petr Kessler1,2
1 Oddělení hematologie a transfuziologie, Nemocnice Pelhřimov, p.o
2 Odddělení hematologie a transfuziologie, Nemocnice Pelhřimov, p.o

Guidelines for clinical practice are formulated in the article: 1. Patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE) should be evaluated

for cancer. The examination including history, physical examination, chest X-ray, abdominal and pelvic ultrasonography, PSA testing

in men and pelvic examination and mammography in women seems be appropriate. Additional testing (CT and endoscopy) should be

indicated only in case of suspicion of cancer. 2. For patients undergoing cancer surgery, pharmacological prophylaxis is recommended.

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5 000 U three times a day, or fondaparinux can be used; LMWHs

are most suitable in Czech Republic. For patients undergoing major cancer surgery extended prophylaxis for 4 weeks is recommended.

Intermittent pneumatic compression is a reasonable alternative for patients who have a high risk of bleeding. 3. For cancer patients, who

are bedridden, or hospitalized with an acute illness, thromboprophylaxis with LMWH is recommended. Patients with multiple myeloma,

undergoing induction therapy, including 2 or more thrombogenic drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, prednison, and

anthracyclines) should be treated with LMWH. In other cancer patients, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is not generally recommended,

however, thromboprophylaxis should be considered in patients with history of VTE, or with multiple risk factors.

Keywords: cancer, thromboprophylaxis, heparin, low molecular heparin.

Published: March 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kessler P. Thrombosis and sarcomas. Med. praxi. 2009;6(1):22-24.
Download citation

References

  1. Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Steffensen FH, et al. The risk of a diagnosis of cancer after primary deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 1169-1173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Monreal M, Fernandez-Llamazares J, Perandreu J, et al. Occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism: which patients, which cancers. Thromb Haemost. 1997; 78: 1316-1318. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Piccioli A, Lensing AW, Prins MH, et al. Extensive screening for occult malignant disease in idiopathic venous thromboembolism: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2004; 2: 884-889. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Carrier M, Le Gal G, Wells PS, et al. Systematic Review: The Trousseau Syndrome Revisited: Should We Screen Extensively for Cancer in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism? Ann Intern Med, September 2, 2008; 149(5): 323-333. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Agnes YY Lee. Thrombosis and Cancer: The Role of Screening for Occult Cancer and Recognizing the Underlying Biological Mechanisms. Hematology 2006: 438-443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Akl EA, Terrenato I, Barba M, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23; 168(12): 1261-1269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133; 381-453. Go to original source...
  8. von Tempelhoff GF, Harenberg J, Niemann F, et al. Effect of low molecular weight heparin (Certoparin) versus unfractionated heparin on cancer survival following breast and pelvic cancer surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind trial. Int J Oncol 2000; 16(4): 815-824. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Maxwell GL, Synan I, Dodge R, et al. Pneumatic compression versus low molecular weight heparin in gynecologic oncology surgery: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98(6): 989-995. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Agnelli G, Bergqvist D, Cohen AT, et al. (PEGASUS investigators): Randomized clinical trial of postoperative fondaparinux versus perioperative dalteparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in high-risk abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2005; 92(10): 1212-1220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Bergqvist D, Agnelli G, Cohen AT, et al. Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. N Engl J Med 2002 Mar 28; 346(13): 975-980. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133; 381-453. Go to original source...
  13. Alikhan R, Cohen AT, Combe S, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients with enoxaparin: a subgroup analysis of the MEDENOX study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2003 Jun; 14(4): 341-346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Elreda L, Vora RK, Cohen AJ. Standardized Thromboprophylaxis Increases Compliance and Reduces Venous Thrombotic Events (TEN) in Hospitalized Cancer Patients, abstract #3020, 50th ASH annual meeting, San Francisco, 6. 12.-9. 12. 2008.
  15. Amin A, Hussein M, Battleman D, et al. Appropriate VTE Prophylaxis Is Associated with Lower Direct Medical Costs among Medical and Surgical Patients in the United States. Abstract#1287, 50th ASH annual meeting, San Francisco, 6. 12.-9. 12. 2008.
  16. Clahsen PC, van de Velde CJ, Julien JP, et al. Thromboembolic complications after perioperative chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group study. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12(6): 1266-1271. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pritchard KI, Paterson AH, Paul NA, et al. Increased thromboembolic complications with concurrent tamoxifen and chemotherapy in a randomized trial of adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Breast Cancer Site Group. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14(10): 2731-2737. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, et al. Risk factors for chemotherapy-associated venous thromboembolism in a prospective observational study. Cancer. 2005 15; 104(12): 2822-2829. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Kessler P, Pour L, Gregora E, et al. (Czech myeloma group): Low molecular weight heparins are effective and safe in thromboprophylaxis in newly diagnosed myeloma patients during the induction therapy. Abstract #P-M-519 J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5(Supplement 2): P-M-519.
  20. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, et al. Italian Multiple Myeloma Network, GIMEMA. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006 Mar 11; 367(9513): 825-831. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Medicine for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.